Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income Tax Officer Vs. M/s. Heritage Project (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2009- 10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Income Tax Officer Vs. M/s. Heritage Project (ITAT Amritsar) The conclusion of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. Ranchi Club Ltd. is that in the absence of any specific mention of the Assessing Officer in the assessment order for charging of interest u/s 234A and 234B, no interest would be recovered from the assessee merely by way of a demand notice. We further find that Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Kishan Lal (HUF) has again followed the order of Hon’ble Supreme Court and has held that in the absence of any direction in the assessment order for ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

  1. S Ramasswamy says:

    In a particular assessment order, the AO has directed the department to charge interest u/s 234. Can the Department charge interest u/s 234A, 234B, etc. on the basis of the said direction in the assessment order.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930