This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
CAT Passes Strictures At ‘Mutual Acrimony’ Between ITAT Members
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- D.K. Srivastava Vs Union of India (Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
The applicant is an Accountant Member of the ITAT, Chandigarh who, having joined the employment aforementioned on 25.8.2003, came to be transferred to the ITAT, Chandigarh Bench on 25.10.2010. He has been, vide order Annexure A-I dated 23.1.2012, ordered to be transferred to the Rajkot Bench of the ITAT. The transfer is indicated to have been ordered “in public interest”.
3′ The applicant has applied for the invalidation of the impugned transfer order by averring that it is punitive in character because he had a difference of opinion in a judicial matter with private Responde...
This is a good hint for the CBI to investigate into the real mystery.