Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Pre amendment Marketing board is not local authority U/s.10(20)

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2011 taxguru.in 987
Case Name
CIT Vs H.P. Marketing Board (Himachal High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement


CIT Vs H.P. Marketing Board (Himachal High Court)- Marketing board is not  a local authority within the meaning of section 10(20) prior to the amendment made in section 10(20) when the word `local authority’ was not defined in the Income tax Act and the definition of `local authority’ as defined in section 3(31) of the General Clause Act was applicable.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

I.T.A. No. 1 of 2007 along with I.T.A. Nos. 17, 18 & 19 of 2007, and I.T.A Nos. 18 & 22 of 2008.

Judgement reserved on: 17.06.2011 Date of decision: 24.06.2011.

Commissioner of Income Tax -Versus- M/s.H.P. Marketing Board

Deepak Gupta, J.

1. These appeals are being disposed of by a single judgement as the question of law involved in all the appeals is same and reads as follows:

2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Honourable Tribunal was right in law in holding that the H.P. Marketing Board is a local authority within the meaning of Section 10(20) of the Income-tax Act, whereas the Marketing Board does not fulfil the ingredients of a Local Authority as defined in Section 3(3 1) of the General Clauses Act, and also does not satisfy the tests laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in Union of India vs. R.C. Jain (1981) 2 SCR 854 and followed in other cases?”

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.