Case Law Details
Case Name : Ganduri Koteshwaramma & Anr. Vs Chakiri Yanadi & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Ganduri Koteshwaramma & Anr. Vs Chakiri Yanadi & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)- A Hindu woman or girl will have equal property rights along with other male relatives for any partition made in intestate succession after September 2005. under the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughters are entitled to equal inheritance rights along with other male siblings, which was not available to them prior to the amendment. The apex court said the female inheritors would not only have the succession rights but also the same liabilities fastened on the property along with the male membe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Muslim ladies were not getting any property rights in marital home ( Re: Shahbano) hence they were given rights in the property of the parents. More so as the Muslim law developed in Arabic conditions and summary divorce was possible . So the woman could fall back on her parents for support.Hindu Law was developed in Indian conditions where a woman ‘doli and arthi ‘ concept was prevalent so the WOMAN got full share in her married home. Of course she could not ask for a partition per se but would get a full share whenever a partition take place.The politics and feminine groups succeeded in reversing time tested practice. NOw Indian woman will get her cake from her parents and eat the cake at the in laws place.
DEAR ALL,
ANY SCOPE TO COMMENCE/ CREATE CHRISTIAN UNDIVIDED FAMILY.
WHETHER WE CAN REQUEST GOVT TO PERMIT ALL RELIGIONS TO CREATE UNDIVIDED FAMILIES, WHICH IS THE MAJOR REQUIREMENT OF OUR SOCIETY AS ON DATE.
FURTHER THERE IS AN ELEMENT OF TAX PLANNING ALSO IS THERE WITH THE CREATION OF HUF / CUF/ MUF ETC……….
Some of the states not having a HUF Act ,(Kerala,WB)1. what will be that state’s married woman?