This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Supreme Court interprets choice of SIAC Rules as exclusion to the applicability of Part I of the Indian Arbitration Act
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Yograj Infrastructure Ltd Vs Ssang Yong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd., (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Yograj Infrastructure Ltd Vs Ssang Yong Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd., (Supreme Court of India)- SC ruled that where the seat of arbitration was Singapore, rules governing the arbitration were of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (“SIAC“) and the substantive law of contract was Indian law, then Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the “1996 Act”) was excluded by implication.
In Bhatia International (supra), wherein while considering the applicability of Part I of the 1996 Act to arbitral proceedings where the seat of arbitration was in India, t...
