Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Service Tax

Denial of Interest on service tax refund specious – Bombay high court

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2011 taxguru.in 548
Case Name
Shroff United Chemicals Limited. Vs The Union of India and others (Bombay High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Shroff United Chemicals Limited. versus The Union of India and others (Mumbai High Court) – The Bombay high court last week described the denial of interest on refund of service tax by the deputy commissioner as “specious” in the case, Shroff United Chemicals Ltd vs Union of India. It asked the revenue authorities to pay interest for the delayed refund. The firm, in anticipation of import of intellectual property services, had obtained service tax registration. It then approached the Reserve Bank for the remittance of funds abroad, for a proposed acquisition of the registration of certain agrochemical products in the U.S. In anticipation of the permission of the Reserve Bank for the remission of funds abroad, it deposited Rs.1.02 crore. However, it did not receive permission on time and therefore it could not acquire the registration. It filed refund claim which was allowed. But the interest on delay was denied. Then the firm moved the high court for interest. The high court allowed the claim and stated that under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, the firm was entitled to interest after three months of receiving the application for refund.
Shroff United Chemicals Limited. Versus The Union of India and others
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3454 OF 2011

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.