Brief:- on the ground that the respondent has committed a violation of the Original Agreement inasmuch as obligations cast upon the respondent under clause 13 of the agreement (supra) have not been discharged by the respondent thereby giving rise to disputes that are in terms of Clause 15 of the original agreement arbitrable — the Supreme Court appointed a sole Arbitrator and all disputes including the dispute regarding interpretation and effect of Clause 4 of the termination agreement referred for adjudication by arbitration — petition allowed.
J U D G M E N T
T.S. THAKUR, J.
1. The respondent is a Dutch citizen. He entered into an agreement dated 14th January, 2008 with the petitioner company whereby the latter appointed him as its marketing representative to promote sale of RFID Tags and Components manufactured by the petitioner-company in European market. Clause (1) of the agreement executed between the parties stipulated the terms on which the respondent was to work as the petitioner’s representative. It reads:
“1. OMNIA does hereby appoint PIM as its Representative for Europe, and PIM hereby accepts the aforesaid appointment, upon the following terms:
Paid content
Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
Deleted Chats, Lost Evidence? Indian Law on Preserving Electronic Records Before Litigation
September 23, 2026
Film Production Companies Should Face PMLA Reporting Obligations
September 23, 2026
Trademark Objection Reply: Common Grounds, Procedure, Hearing and Outcomes
September 22, 2026
IRDAI Repeals Dividend Repatriation Guidelines for Foreign-Owned Insurance Intermediaries
September 22, 2026
Bank Cannot Recover Husband’s Loan from Wife’s Fixed Deposit: Allahabad HC
September 22, 2026
