Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dinesh T. Tailor Vs. TRO (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: Writ Petition No. 641 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/04/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DECIDED BY: HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, IN THE CASE OF: Dinesh T. Tailor Vs. TRO, APPEAL NO: Writ Petition No. 641 of 2010, DECIDED ON April 27, 2010

______ORAL JUDGMENT_______

ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)

1. Rule. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. Counsel for the respondents waives service.

2. The petitioner was appointed as an Additional director of a company by the name of Yazad Investment & Finance Private Limited on 2 January 1987. During the period when he was a director, the petitioner signed audited accounts of the company on 30 June 1987 and 30 June 1988. The petitioner resigned as a director of the company on 14 October 1989. Form 32 was filed with the Registrar of Companies notifying that the petitioner ceased to be a director.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031