This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
The expression "Tax due" in section 179(1) will not comprehend within its ambit a penalty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dinesh T. Tailor Vs. TRO (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
DECIDED BY: HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, IN THE CASE OF: Dinesh T. Tailor Vs. TRO, APPEAL NO: Writ Petition No. 641 of 2010, DECIDED ON April 27, 2010
______ORAL JUDGMENT_______
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
1. Rule. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. Counsel for the respondents waives service.
2. The petitioner was appointed as an Additional director of a company by the name of Yazad Investment & Finance Pr...
