California Burrito Pte Ltd Vs Burrito Restaurants Private Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
Summary: The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench, considered an application concerning a proposed inbound cross-border merger between California Burrito Private Limited, a Singapore-incorporated company, and Burrito Restaurants Private Limited, the Indian transferee company, under Sections 230-232 and Section 234 of the Companies Act, 2013, read with the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 and the Foreign Exchange Management (Cross Border Merger) Regulations, 2018.
The Scheme contemplated amalgamation of the Singapore transferor company into the Indian transferee company as a going concern, subject to approvals under Indian and Singapore law. The Scheme provided for issuance of shares by the transferee company to the shareholders of the transferor company based on the prescribed share exchange ratio and cancellation of shares of the transferee company held by the transferor company. The Tribunal considered the corporate objects, share capital, financial position, valuation report, accounting-standard compliance and the proposed mechanism for implementation of the Scheme.
The Scheme contemplated an Appointed Date of April 1, 2026, subject to the provisions of the Scheme and approval by the Tribunal. The Tribunal thereafter issued directions concerning meetings of equity shareholders, preference shareholders and unsecured creditors of the transferee company, while recording that there were no secured creditors and therefore no meeting of secured creditors was required. The order prescribed the quorum, meeting dates and times, appointment of the Chairperson and Scrutinizer, notice and advertisement requirements, regulatory notices and filing of compliance affidavits.
Want to Read the Complete Judgment?
You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.
Already subscribed? Log in
One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.






