This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Anticipatory Bail Denied to Accountant for Prima Facie Role in ₹30 Crore Fake ITC Fraud: Bombay Court
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ashutosh Pandey Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Court of Session at Greater Bombay)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Appellate Authority
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ashutosh Pandey Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (Court of Session at Greater Bombay)
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) in connection with File No. DGGI/INTL/495/2026/409 registered by CGST, Mumbai for offences punishable under Section 132 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
The applicant contended that he was neither a Director of M/s. Drishti Steel Company nor M/s. SKDK Steels Private Limited and was merely employed as an accountant-support staff with M/s. Drishti Steel Company. He a...
Author Info
