Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Bombay HC Allows GST Refund Because Section 54 Amendment Is Prospective

Case Law Details

Case Name
Babasaheb Kedar Shetkari Sahakari Soot Girni Limited Vs State of Maharashtra and others (Bombay High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Babasaheb Kedar Shetkari Sahakari Soot Girni Limited Vs State of Maharashtra and others (Bombay High Court) The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner’s GST refund applications for excess input tax relating to the period December 2017 to March 2018. The refund applications had been rejected on two grounds: first, that the application for December 2017 was filed beyond the time prescribed after the 2019 amendment to Section 54(1) of the GST Act, and second, that the applications for January to March 2018 could not be accepted because the refund...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,192

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *