This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Restriction to ₹3L Invalid After CBDT Raised Leave Encashment Limit to ₹25 Lakh
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Satish Chandra Tyagi Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Satish Chandra Tyagi Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Delhi)
The appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dated 28.08.2024, arising from a rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2019–20. The core issue in dispute was the denial of deduction under section 10(10AA) in respect of leave encashment and its restriction to the earlier exemption limit of ₹3,00,000.
The assessee contended that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), through Notification No. 31/2023 issued by the Ministry o...







Can you take Bangalore cases