Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Bombay HC Quashes GST Demand as Assignment of Leasehold Rights Is Transfer of Immovable Property

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 3013
Case Name
Vidarbha Beverages Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Vidarbha Beverages Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court)

In Vidarbha Beverages Vs Vishal S/o Hasmukh Panchamatia, the Bombay High Court examined a writ petition challenging a show cause notice dated 18 June 2025 issued by the tax authorities demanding Goods and Services Tax (GST) of ₹59,40,000 along with interest of ₹40,98,600 under Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The demand related to alleged non-payment of GST on the transfer of leasehold rights in a plot belonging to MIDC, which the petitioner had assigned to a third party for ₹3,30,00,000. The transfer had been executed with the consent of MIDC, and the petitioner had paid ₹10,40,600 as additional premium.

According to the respondents, the assignment of leasehold rights amounted to a supply of services under Section 7(1) of the GST Act read with Clause 2(b) of Schedule II, which treats certain leasing and letting activities as supply of services. The authorities also considered the transaction to be a service classifiable under “other miscellaneous services” taxable at 18% under Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017.

The Court observed that the transaction in question was an assignment of leasehold rights rather than a lease or sub-lease. The show cause notice itself acknowledged that the transaction did not amount to a sub-lease because the petitioner’s rights were extinguished after the transfer. The Court noted that classifying such a transaction under “other miscellaneous services” was not appropriate, as that category primarily includes services such as washing, cleaning, dyeing, beauty, and physical well-being services, which could not reasonably be extended to assignment of leasehold rights in immovable property.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,185

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.