This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
DRT Disallows Prepayment Charges After Loan Recall as Borrower Did Not Seek Early Repayment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs Sh. Brij Satvindra Pal Singh Ahaluwalia (DRT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT)
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited Vs Sh. Brij Satvindra Pal Singh Ahaluwalia (DRT Delhi)
The application was filed by the bank on 16.06.2014 under Section 19 of the RDB Act, 1993 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Delhi, seeking recovery of ₹12,38,383 along with interest at 19% per annum from the date of filing of the application until full realization.
According to the bank, defendant no.1 had requested a loan facility and was sanctioned financial assistance of ₹21,00,000 under a loan agreement dated 29.05.2012. The loan was secured by hypothecation of purchased construction equipment an...
Author Info
