Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Runwal Commercial Assets Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Runwal Commercial Assets Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Sec 68 Addition on Share Capital Deleted – Round-Tripping Allegation & Lack of Commercial Expediency Not Sufficient Without Evidence – ITAT Mumbai AO treated ₹85.90 Cr received towards share capital as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 alleging round-tripping of funds within group entities and absence of commercial substance. CIT(A) upheld addition holding that identity alone is not sufficient and assessee failed to prove creditworthiness & genuineness beyond banking trail. ITAT held that identity of subscriber, genuineness...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031