Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Atul Bansal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Atul Bansal Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) This case involved cross-appeals against CIT(A) order where the AO treated huge advances of ₹71.08 Cr as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) and disallowed deduction u/s 54. The Tribunal examined shareholding thresholds, accumulated profits, NBFC exception & factual matrix in detail. Issue 1 — Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): The AO made addition alleging loans from group companies (ABW Infrastructure Ltd., VPS Realtors Pvt. Ltd., Par Excellence Leasing & Financial Services Ltd.). CIT(A) deleted most additions after verifying shareholding & nature of rese...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930