Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Supriya Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Supriya Roy Vs ITO (ITAT Guwahati) Addition Based Solely on Statement of Employee (Husband) During Survey u/s 133A Unsustainable; Entire Addition Deleted – ITAT Guwahati The ITAT Guwahati allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2018-19 & deleted additions made on the basis of statement recorded during survey u/s 133A, holding that such additions were legally unsustainable. In this case, a survey u/s 133A was conducted at the business premises of the assessee, a retail trader of mustard oil. During survey, the statement of the assessee’s husband, who was an employee, was recorded. Based ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930