Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sahana Jewellery Exports Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sahana Jewellery Exports Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Penalty u/s 271B Deleted for Delay in Audit Report Due to Managing Director’s Illness: ITAT Chennai Grants Relief The Chennai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17 and deleted the penalty of ₹1.50 lakh levied under Section 271B for delayed furnishing of audit report under Section 44AB. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in jewellery business, had filed its tax audit report on 11.01.2017, beyond the extended due date of 17.10.2016, leading the Assessing Officer to levy penalty which was up...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930