Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : JR Modi Associates Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
JR Modi Associates Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The Assessing Officer treated ₹45 lakh received by the assessee as unexplained cash credit under section 68, alleging lack of genuineness and creditworthiness because the amount was received in cash as advance against sale of property and the original property deal was later cancelled. The CIT(A) upheld the addition, doubting the transaction since neither the original nor the subsequent property transfer ultimately materialised and 90% of the consideration was allegedly paid in cash without banking trail. The Tribunal deleted the addition after ex...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930