Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Payal Garg (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Payal Garg (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi: Bogus Purchases Cannot Be Added u/s 69C When Source of Expenditure Is Explained – Section 69C Misapplied The Delhi Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and allowed the assessee’s cross-objection, holding that addition made under section 69C read with section 115BBE in respect of alleged bogus purchases was legally unsustainable. The Assessing Officer had disallowed purchases of ₹4.51 crore from six suppliers by treating them as unexplained expenditure on the ground that the suppliers were non-filers, had low turnovers, or did not ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031