Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharat Kumar Bansal Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharat Kumar Bansal Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) One Satisfaction Can’t Fit Seven Years: ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Section 153C Proceedings for Consolidated Satisfaction Note The ITAT Hyderabad allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2013–14 to 2019–20, holding that the initiation of proceedings under section 153C was invalid in law as it was based on a single consolidated satisfaction note covering multiple assessment years. A search under section 132 was conducted on a third party on 22.11.2018, during which an agreement of sale dated 28.08.2018 was seized. Relying on this document, the Asse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930