Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Gang Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-2019
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Gang Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Allows TDS Credit Despite Non-Deposit by Employer: Section 205 Bars Recovery from Employee The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal of Anil Kumar Gang for AY 2018–19, directing grant of TDS credit of ₹2,12,350 which had been denied by CPC and upheld by the CIT(A) on the ground that the employer had deducted but not deposited the tax with the Government. The assessee had received repayment of his contribution to an approved superannuation fund from his employer after deduction of TDS, duly offered the income to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai Section 69A Cannot Be Invoked for Cash Withdrawals from Own Bank Account Income Declared in Original Return Cannot Be Reduced in Section 148 Return: ITAT Hyderabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031