Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jamnaben Parshottamdas Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Jamnaben Parshottamdas Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Deleted Where Income Was Fully Disclosed but Recharacterised: The Ahmedabad Bench (SMC) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2011-12 and deleted the penalty of ₹64,071 levied under section 271(1)(c), holding that mere recharacterisation of income does not amount to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. In this case, the assessee had disclosed profits from sale of shares as long-term capital gains in the return. During reassessment proceedings, the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Salary Taxable Only on Accrual, Not Mere Form 16 or 26AS Entries: Bengaluru ITAT Search Assessments Restored Despite Non-Compliance, Subject to ₹50,000 Cost: Bengaluru ITAT Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Specific Charge: Bengaluru ITAT TDS Credit Denied Where Income Taxed in Another Entity’s Hands: ITAT Bangalore Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied for Technical Lapses if Form 67 Was Timely Filed: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031