Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jamnaben Parshottamdas Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jamnaben Parshottamdas Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Deleted Where Income Was Fully Disclosed but Recharacterised: The Ahmedabad Bench (SMC) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2011-12 and deleted the penalty of ₹64,071 levied under section 271(1)(c), holding that mere recharacterisation of income does not amount to concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. In this case, the assessee had disclosed profits from sale of shares as long-term capital gains in the return. During reassessment proceedings, the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930