Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajendra Kumar Shet Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Rajendra Kumar Shet Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore Restores Jewellery Demonetisation Additions for Fresh Verification Where Cash Sales Bills Show Only “Cash” Buyers The Bangalore ITAT partly allowed the appeal of Assessee, a jeweller, and restored to AO two major additions relating to demonetisation-period sales for fresh examination. The dispute arose from (i) addition of ₹22,65,024 as difference between September 2016 turnover declared in VAT return and higher turnover recorded in books, and (ii) addition of ₹1,32,38,548 treated as alleged excess turnover/cash credits for Oct...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031