Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nisar Ebrahim Ookabhoy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nisar Ebrahim Ookabhoy Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Deductee Can’t Be Penalised for Deductor’s Default: ITAT Mumbai Directs TDS Credit Despite 26AS Mismatch ITAT Mumbai (SMC Bench) in Nisar Ebrahim Ookabhoy vs ITO (ITA No. 6638/Mum/2025, AY 2020-21, order dated 24.12.2025) has allowed the assessee’s appeal, holding that TDS credit cannot be denied merely because the deductor failed to deposit tax and the credit does not reflect in Form 26AS. The Assessee had let out a flat under a leave & license agreement providing for 10% TDS on rent. Though the licensee deducted ₹1,47,600, it deposited ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delhi ITAT Upholds Deletion of Penny Stock Additions; Mere Suspicion and Investigation Reports Cannot Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031