This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Retention of Gold Upheld Because Section 132B Timeline Isn’t Mandatory
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Rajesh Gupta & Ors. Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Rajesh Gupta & Ors. Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court)
120 Days Not Automatic Release: Delhi HC Upholds Retention of Seized Jewellery Pending AO’s Satisfaction u/s 132B
The Delhi High Court, in Rajesh Gupta & Ors. vs ACIT, Central Circle-31 & Ors. (W.P.(C) No. 12433/2025, judgment dated 23.12.2025), dismissed the writ petition seeking release of gold coins and jewellery seized during a search conducted u/s 132 in October 2024. Jewellery worth about ₹3.88 crore was seized, though the Petitioners claimed that the entire jewellery was duly disclosed in their ITRs and Wealth-tax Returns an...
Author Info
