This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Affidavits Alone Cannot Displace Proceeds of Crime Presumption
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gajendra Narayan Vs Deputy Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Appellate Authority
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Gajendra Narayan Vs Deputy Director (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA Delhi)
Marriage Gifts Story Fails the Test — SAFEMA Tribunal Upholds PMLA Attachment of Flat Advance & Bank Balances as Proceeds of Crime
The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal filed by Shri Gajendra Narayan against confirmation of provisional attachment passed under the PMLA, 2002, holding that large cash deposits made in his bank accounts were not supported by any cogent or reliable evidence and were rightly treated as proceeds of crime.
The attachment covered advance pay...





