This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition u/s. 68 based on certain statement not sustained as documentary evidence not considered
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Lalitha Jewellery Mart Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Madras High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
CIT Vs Lalitha Jewellery Mart Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court)
Madras High Court held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit merely on the basis of certain statement without considering documentary evidence is not justifiable. Accordingly, writ of revenue is dismissed.
Facts- The assessee company is engaged in the business of retail trading in gold jewellery and the assessee had filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2012-2013 on 28.9.2012 declaring total income of Rs.27,59,23,680/-. On 2.9.2014, a search and seizure opera...
Author Info
