This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
SC Holds Expired Mandate Cannot Be Revived – Substitution Ordered Under Section 29A(6)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mohan Lal Fatehpuria Vs Bharat Textiles & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Mohan Lal Fatehpuria Vs Bharat Textiles & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
No Life Support for Expired Mandate-Extension Impermissible: SC Orders Substitution of Arbitrator Under Section 29A(6)
Delay Has a Price- Arbitrator Became Functus Officio— SC Refuses Extension
Background
Appellants & respondents were partners in a firm governed by an arbitration clause.
Delhi High Court had earlier (13.03.2020) appointed Mr. Anjum Javed as sole arbitrator, with fee payable as per Fourth Schedule.
Arbitrator entered reference on 05.2020 & issued several directions between 2020–2023 seeki...
Author Info
