Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sudhaker Munigeti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-2020
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sudhaker Munigeti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Hyderabad Tribunal examined legality of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Jurisdictional AO (JAO) despite the statutory mandate of the Faceless Jurisdiction Scheme, 2022. Assessee had not filed return. JAO issued notice u/s 148A(b) on 28.02.2023, passed order u/s 148A(d) on 29.03.2023 & issued notice u/s 148 on the same day. Assessee challenged jurisdiction, arguing that post-2022, reassessment can be initiated only by the Faceless AO, relying heavily on Telangana High Court in Kankanala Ravindra Reddy, subsequent Telangana HC ruling (WP 29...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Penalty on Estimated Bogus Purchases: ITAT Deletes U/s 271(1)(c) Levy On-Money Addition Based on Excel Sheet Deleted: No Corroborative Evidence Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930