This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Benefit of omission of rule 96(10) of CGST Rules to be extended to all pending proceedings
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Vinayak International Housewares Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Vinayak International Housewares Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court held that benefit of omission of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules sought to be extended to all the pending proceedings. Accordingly, proceedings deserves to be quashed. Thus, writ petitions are allowed.
Facts- The present petitions have been filed by the Petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the vires of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. Notably, the Petitioner was issued summ...
Author Info
