This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) without specifying limb is bad-in-law
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Ennoble Construction (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
PCIT Vs Ennoble Construction (Karnataka High Court)
Karnataka High Court held that initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act without specifying the limb under which penalty proceedings has been initiated is bad-in-law. Accordingly, question is answered in favour of respondent/assessee.
Facts- The appeal is preferred by the assessee / respondent against the separate orders dated 24.09.2013 of the CIT (Appeals)-VI, Bengaluru for the Assessment Year 2006-07 confirming the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It...
Author Info
