Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suresh Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suresh Chand Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Assessee filed an appeal against the NFAC order dated 24.10.2024 confirming reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s.144 for AY 2014-15. There was a delay of 105 days, for which a condonation petition was filed. Tribunal found the reasons sufficient and condoned the delay. The core grievance was that the CIT(A)/NFAC rejected additional evidence merely because it was not accompanied by a formal Rule 46A petition. Tribunal noted that although the technical requirement was not fulfilled, the Assessee had submitted all material documents intended to substantiate claims on me...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031