Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kanchan Chopra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Kanchan Chopra Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)  Assessee filed an appeal against NFAC order dated 19.08.2024 confirming addition of ₹1,66,70,000 u/s 68 r.w.s.115BBE, treating cash deposits during demonetisation as unexplained. An additional legal ground was also raised alleging absence of valid jurisdictional notice u/s 143(2), as the notice was issued by Ward-40(1) while the assessment was completed by Ward-43(6). AO furnished a detailed jurisdictional report confirming restructuring of charges under orders u/s 120, after which the case validly vested with Ward-43(6). Tribunal, satisfied with the expl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Where Deemed Search Date Is After 1-4-2021: ITAT Bangalore Selling & Marketing Expenses Cannot Be Disallowed Due to Ledger Nomenclature Error: ITAT Bangalore Executive Search Fees Not Taxable as FTS or Royalty Under India–Netherlands DTAA: ITAT Mumbai No TDS on Reimbursement of Common Legal Expenses: ITAT Mumbai BSNL VRS Employees Eligible for Full Exemption of Retrenchment Compensation & Leave Encashment: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031