Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

Arbitration Award Final: SC Upholds 24% Interest Rate Despite Usurious Loans Act Challenge

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 11167
Case Name
Lakshmi Hotel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sriram City Union Finance Ltd. & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement

Lakshmi Hotel Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Sriram City Union Finance Ltd. & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)

SC Upholds 24% Interest in Commercial Loan Arbitration Award & Rejects Challenge Based on Usurious Loans Act/Public Policy

Background

  • Appellants borrowed ₹1.57 crore from the Respondent NBFC at 24% p.a. (two agreements – 2006).
  • Only ₹44.66 lakh repaid; thereafter continuous default.
  • Appellants issued a ₹1.89 crore cheque, which bounced (NI Act proceedings initiated).
  • Arbitration invoked; Arbitrator awarded ₹2.21 crore + 24% p.a.
  • Section 34 challenge dismissed; Section 37 appeal dismissed; liquidation of borrower company also initiated.

Appellants’ Key Arguments

  • 24% interest is unconscionable, usurious & contrary to RBI guidelines.
  • Agreements were allegedly signed on blank papers; interest inserted later.
  • Usurious Loans Act, 1918 & public policy grounds invoked.

Respondent’s Key Contentions

  • Borrowers were already defaulters of Indian Bank, making the loan high-risk → justified higher rate.
  • Contractually agreed interest cannot be reopened.
  • NBFCs are not governed by State usury laws (as per SC in Nedumpilli Finance).

Supreme Court’s Findings

  • Post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) is mandatory unless Arbitrator specifies otherwise.
  • Arbitrator has full discretion to award the contractual rate; courts cannot interfere unless perverse.
  • Both courts below found loan agreements genuine- SC refused re-appreciation of evidence (bar under Section 34(2A)).
  • Borrowers showed consistent non-payment: defaults, false assurances, dishonoured cheque, failure even during CIRP.
  • High interest in a commercial loan is not against public policy unless it “shocks the conscience”—24% does not.
  • Usurious Loans Act, 1918 is outdated & overridden by the Arbitration Act framework; not applicable to NBFC lending.

Conclusion

  • No error by High Court under Sections 34 or 37.
  • Contractual 24% interest upheld for both pre-award & post-award periods.
  • Appeal dismissed by Supreme Court.

FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,879

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.