Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Company Law

Adverse Remarks Against IRP not binding Without Opportunity to Respond: NCLAT

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pulkit Gupta Vs Keshav Khaneja (NCLAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLAT
Advertisement Pulkit Gupta Vs Keshav Khaneja (NCLAT Delhi) Summary: The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Delhi dealt with two appeals filed by the Appellant, Pulkit Gupta, challenging parts of an order dated 13.06.2025 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in CP (IB) No. 195/AHM/2025 and CP (IB) No. 199/AHM/2025. The Adjudicating Authority had admitted Section 7 applications filed by the Financial Creditor but declined to appoint the Appellant as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The Appellant was aggrieved not by the admission of the insolvency petitions but by certa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,778

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *