CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Medicament Supplies to Government Hospitals and Institutional Buyers shall be valued in terms of Section 4 and not Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that when application of income is more than receipts of year, excess application of income i.e., expenditure in the hands of the assessee can be carried forward to succeeding Year.
The ITAT in Mumbai cancels penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, in the case of Fancy Diamonds India Pvt Ltd. The tribunal held that such penalties aren’t applicable when additions are made purely on estimation
ITAT Mumbai held that payment on account of employees contribution towards PF and ESI after the due date of the respective acts is disallowable in terms of section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that proceeds received by assessee-company carrying on business of power generation on sale of certified emission reduction credit (carbon credit) is a capital receipt and not business income.
An in-depth examination of the recent ITAT Ahmedabad verdict in the DCIT vs. Shiv Build case. The ruling highlights that no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) can be made for the short deduction of tax, creating a precedent for future cases.
Analysis of the recent ITAT Mumbai judgment concerning Secunderabad Healthcare Ltd Vs CIT, focusing on the inclusion of commission earned from accommodation entry in the total income of the assessee.
The ITAT Pune overturned a revisionary order of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, asserting that no revision is necessary under section 263 of the Income Tax Act if the Assessing Officer (AO) conducts appropriate verification during the assessment.
Unlock the intricacies of CBICs latest circular 197/09/2023-GST on GST refunds. Get quick answers to key questions and gain clarity on ITC, zero-rated supplies, and adjusted total turnover calculation.
In Lily Thomas V Union of India & Ors. case, the landmark judgement was taken, the case was filed as a writ petition and it was filed as a review petition of the case Sarla Mugdal v UOI, the case was filed under article 20,21,25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution, 1950.
