The Union Cabinet had approved the promulgation of the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2014 to amend the Insurance Act, 1938, the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act, 1972 and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999, in accordance with the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill 2008 as reported by the Select Committee of the Rajya Sabha, and for suitably introducing it in the Parliament in the next session for consideration and passing.
1. Step 1: CPC (TDS) will first process Original TDS Statements till the stage of 26AS generation for deductees reported. 2 Step 2: Short Payments and PAN Errors will be identified in the preliminary check of the Original statements.
Form 24G Return Preparation Utility (RPU) and File Validation Utility (FVU) Version 1.4 for the Form 24G Statements from FY 2005-06 onwards released (26/12/2014) Key features of NSDL Return Preparation Utility (RPU) version 1.4 · Quoting of structurally valid TAN of DDO: Quoting of structurally invalid TAN of DDO has been discontinued i.e., values quoted, […]
n the light of various references received from the field formation from time to time, existing guidelines on compounding of offences under Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) have been reviewed and in supersession of the same, including the guidelines issued vide F.No. 285/90/2008-IT(Inv.)/12 dated 16th May 2008, the following guidelines are issued for compliance by all concerned.
FM: Immediate Challenges Before the Government is to Increase the Growth Rate as it Will Boost Both the Economic Activities and the Revenue Collections The Union Finance Minister Shri Arun Jaitley said that immediate challenges before the Government is to increase the growth rate as it will boost both the economic activities and the revenue […]
DCW Limited(“the Assessee”)was covered by Notification No. 96/2004-Customs dated September 17,2004passed in exercise of powers under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 granting exemption of Basic Customs Duty subject to debit of the DEPB Licence.
In the instant case, A. Vairavel (the Assessee) used dyes and chemicals in execution of works contract of dyeing. The Department argued thatthe said transaction involvestransfer of property involved in the use of dyes and chemicals used in works contract of dyeing and hence assessable
The Revenue alleged that the exemption availed was wrong as the impugned goods were not classifiable under Chapter heading specified in the Exemption Notification. Therefore, proceedings were initiated against the Appellant demanding differential Customs duty of Rs. 1,48,92,523/-.
Corrigendum is issued for the correction of error or omissions in the original document, which relates back to the date of initial authoring for the reason that correction means whatever written was not correct or there was some mistake which need be corrected.
The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai after considering the provisions of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and Packaged Commodity Rules, 1977 and relying upon the decision in the case of Geoffery Manners & Co. Ltd. Vs. CCE [2006 (204) ELT 403] held that since the toothpaste were supplied as ‘free sample’ and were not meant for retail sale, the provisions of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and Packaged Commodity Rules, 1977 would not apply at all and, therefore, the provisions of Section 4A of the Excise Act would also not apply.
