Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under Section 270A cannot be levied merely because income was estimated after rejection of books. Si...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Department explains how faceless assessments under Section 144B operate through the e-Filing portal without requiri...
Income Tax : The guide explains faceless assessments, appeals, penalties, rectification requests, and demand responses under the Income-tax Act...
Income Tax : Courts have held that non-compliance with mandatory procedures under Section 144B renders faceless assessment orders void. The rul...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : The Kerala High Court, today admitted a batch of Writ Petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Faceless Assessment...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded the case to examine whether Section 56(2)(x) applied based on the agreement date and to consider refund of ex...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata condoned appeal delay, set aside the CIT(A)'s order, and remanded the assessment for fresh adjudication after grantin...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed a Section 148 notice issued after the limitation under the first proviso to Section 149, holding the reassessm...
Income Tax : The High Court held that an assessment order passed without issuing a show cause notice detailing the proposed additions violated ...
Income Tax : CBDT issues guidelines for IT verification under Section 144B(5), detailing circumstances for digital and physical checks, effecti...
Income Tax : In pursuance of sub-section (3) of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the fo...
Income Tax : Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Assessment Unit (AU), Verification Unit (VU), Technical Unit (TU) and Review Unit (RU) unde...
Income Tax : Roll out of first phase of changes in ITBA functionalities for Faceless Assessment due to amendments in Section 144B by Finance Ac...
Income Tax : National Faceless Penalty Centre, in accordance with the guidelines issued by the Board, may,–– (a) in a case where imposit...
Kerala High Court orders Alka Ventures Pvt Ltd to pay 12 crore as advance tax for appeal against assessment order. Details of the judgment provided.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that no addition is warranted under Sec 56(2)(x)(b)(B)(ii) of Income Tax Act when difference between purchase value and fair market value is less than 10%.
In the case of ITO Vs Raj Maitry & Eskon Developer, ITAT Mumbai decides advance received from customers isn’t income under section 68. Detailed analysis of the ruling.
Detailed analysis of Mahendra N. Patel Vs DCIT case where ITAT Ahmedabad nullifies penalty due to absence of misreporting or underreporting by the assessee.
Kerala High Court dismisses writ petition citing availability of an alternative remedy before ITAT. Details of the case and judgment here.
Bombay High Court held that mandatory faceless procedure for issuance of notice u/s. 148 would not exclude the Central charges and International taxation charges from the application of the faceless mechanism as notified u/s. 144B r.w.s. 151A of the Act.
Read the full text of ITAT Kolkata’s order in Kanchan Vanijya Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT case, where the assessment order was quashed due to violation of principles of natural justice.
Explore case of Polyspin Filteration India Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Delhi, shedding light on legal principle that VAT authorities’ classification of a supplier as bogus doesn’t automatically invalidate transactions, requiring factual scrutiny.
Learn how online gaming habits can lead to income tax scrutiny notices under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand the pitfalls and avoid costly mistakes.
In a case between Konkan Education Society Sevak Sahakari Patpedhi Ltd and ITO, ITAT Pune rules interest & dividend from cooperative investment deductible under Income Tax Act.
