Company Law : The FAQ clarifies that the Companies Act, 2013 does not restrict adjournment of a duly convened and commenced AGM. An adjourned AG...
Company Law : This FAQ examines the statutory authorities empowered to convene an Extraordinary General Meeting under the Companies Act, 2013. I...
Company Law : The 2025 amendment replaces annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a triennial compliance framework. Directors now need to file KYC once ev...
Company Law : The article explains when private companies can rely on MCA exemptions to borrow through board approval alone. It highlights the b...
Company Law : The article explains how Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals apply to related party transactions under corporate law...
Company Law : The MCA has widened CSR eligibility by recognizing subscriptions to Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments as a valid CSR activity...
Company Law : The initiative addresses inefficiencies in the current filing system and proposes consolidation and automation. It highlights a sh...
Company Law : NFRA found major deficiencies in audit documentation and archival practices. The report highlights the need for stronger controls ...
Company Law : The inspection report highlights deficiencies in audit documentation, independence monitoring and compliance with auditing standar...
Company Law : The regulator found that the audit firm lacked an effective monitoring mechanism to ensure firmwide independence policies were pro...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : That the period of lockdown ordered by the Central Government and the State Governments including the period as may be extended ei...
Company Law : The MCA has amended the valuation rules to require Registered Valuer Organisations to maintain a minimum paid-up capital of ₹25 ...
Company Law : The Registrar of Companies penalized the company and its authorized signatory after an incorrect document was attached with Form A...
Company Law : MCA amends Schedule VII of the Companies Act to include subscription to zero coupon zero principal instruments on Social Stock Exc...
Company Law : MCA has amended the CSR Rules to recognize zero coupon zero principal instruments issued by Social Stock Exchange-listed NPOs. The...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai held that repeated return of official notices proved non-maintenance of a registered office under Section 12(1) of the ...
Registrar of Companies, Andhra Pradesh, had imposed a penalty of Rs. 35,00,000 on the company and its directors. However, considering the circumstances surrounding the failure to appoint a Company Secretary, the Regional Director has reduced the penalty to Rs. 1,69,820 for the company and Rs. 69,820 each for the Managing Director and CFO (total aggregating to Rs.3,09,460/-).
Company is into huge losses and not in a position to appoint Company Secretary and stated initially company is having Company Secretary upto 2019 and also put all its efforts to retain the Company Secretaries on long term basis as well as to fill the vacancy to the office of the Whole Time Company Secretary. However, the Company was unable to find a suitable candidate who are committed to work on long term basis.
Registrar of Companies in his order of adjudication has stated that the Company has appointed Mr. Sachin Bansal as the Managing Director and CEO of the Company (KMP) vide its Board Resolution dated 27.02.2020 for a period of five years from 06.03.2020. However, by inadvertence, the Board had omitted to Co opt him as Additional Director before appointing him as Managing Director.
The Company has not maintained its registered office pursuant to sub-section (1) and (4) of Section 12 of the Act w.e.f. 23.12.2021 (date of spot inspection conducted by this office) thereby attracting penal provisions under sub-section (8) of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013. The offence is of serious nature since non-maintenance of registered […]
The Company has not filed Annual Return(s) and Financial Statement(s) pursuant to sub-section (4) of Section 92 and sub-section (1) of Section 137 of the Act respectively for financial year ending 31.03.2021, thereby attracting penal provisions under sub-section (5) of Section 92 and subsection (3) of Section 137 of the Act respectively. The offence is […]
Applicant Company and its officers who have made the default in complying provision of Rule 14(8) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of securities) Rules 2014 of companies Act, 2013 as private placement offer cum applications at different dates were issued before filing special resolution to ROC. Hence, they are liable for penalties under section 450 of Act, 2013.
Company is required to appoint a woman director based on Rule 3(ii) of Companies (Appointment and qualification of Directors) Rules, 2014 as Turnover of company is more than 300 Crore.
Discover how Zyden Gentec Limited faced an ₹8 Lakh penalty from MCA for not attaching Secretarial audit report (in form MR-3) for financial years 2015-16 and 2016-17, as required by Section 204 of Companies Act, 2013. Details of violation and penalties explained.
In a recent development, the Registrar of Companies, Rajasthan, Jaipur, has taken strict action against M/s INTERLINK EXPORTS LIMITED and its key personnel, Shri NARAYAN TUKARAM BADDI (CFO) and Shri ALOK NARAYAN BADDI (CEO), for their failure to comply with the provisions of Section 204(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. This non-compliance pertains to the […]
Order for Penalty of Rs. 4.50 lakh under Section 454 for violation of Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014
