#Cestat judgments
Log in to FollowLatest Cestat judgments updates, notifications, rulings, case laws, classification, valuation and customs or indirect tax analysis on TaxGuru.

Automatic Soap Dispenser Cannot Be Classified as Toiletry Spray Since Product Only Dispenses Foam: CESTAT Bangalore

CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax Demand as Exporter Was Not Recipient of Foreign Bank Services

CESTAT Sets Aside Customs Demand Due to Absence of Mandatory SCN

CESTAT Rejects Cenvat Credit Claim as Amount Was Not Paid Towards CVD

Rule 8 Valuation Inapplicable on Job Work Goods Returned to Principal Manufacturer

Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ST-3 & ITR Mismatch Unsustainable: CESTAT Allahabad

No AED on Pre-Budget Stock Cleared After Levy Date; Excise Duty Arises on Manufacture, Not Removal: CESTAT Ahmedabad

Mandarin Juice Concentrate Not Classifiable as Orange Juice: CESTAT Mumbai

Transfer of Development Rights Not Taxable as Service as It Involves Immovable Property: CESTAT

Separate Penalty on Partner Not Sustainable Once Partnership Firm Penalized: CESTAT Ahmedabad

CESTAT Sets Aside IGST Demand as Extended Limitation Was Wrongly Invoked

Foreign Markings Alone Cannot Prove Gold Was Smuggled: CESTAT Hyderabad

CESTAT Deletes Service Tax Demand Because Photo Printing Activity Was Held as Manufacture

Bluetooth Earphones Classifiable Under Heading 8518 as Audio Devices, Not Data Transmission Machines
Explore the latest Cestat judgments updates on TaxGuru, including notifications, circulars, classification and valuation issues, exemptions, import-export procedures and important judicial or advance-ruling developments. The coverage helps importers, exporters and professionals track changes in customs and indirect tax law and understand their practical compliance, duty and litigation implications.
