Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court examined whether a taxpayer’s selection of “No” for personal hearing could override the statutory req...
Goods and Services Tax : The Orissa High Court examined whether tax could be demanded after reversal of the disputed ITC. It held that raising a fresh dema...
Goods and Services Tax : The Rajasthan High Court examined whether GST registration could be refused due to non-filing of returns in another State. It held...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court stayed a judgment that held mere uploading of notices and orders on the GST portal does not amount to valid comm...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court refused to bypass the statutory GST appeal mechanism and directed the taxpayer to pursue appellate remedies. How...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors Vs Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The ...
Goods and Services Tax : The 45th meeting of Goods and Services Tax Council (“GST Council”) is scheduled to be held on September 17, 2021. The Ministry...
Custom Duty, Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court in M/s Pellagic Food Ingredients Private Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 14737/2021[T-CUS] issu...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court ruled that the Supreme Court’s COVID-19 limitation exclusion must be considered while computing timelines...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court held that exoneration under Section 73 does not automatically bar proceedings under Section 74 because both p...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether a single GST show cause notice can cover multiple financial years under Section 7...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court took up a challenge to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act where ITC was denied despite tax having been paid by the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court prima facie observed that Section 67(4) permits sealing of premises only when access is denied. It issued notice...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 32/2015-Central Excise Dated- 4th June, 2015 Ethanol produced from molasses generated from cane crushed in the ...
Service Tax : Circular No. 184/3/2015-ST Dated the 3rd June, 2015 It is further clarified that exemption from service tax still continues to ser...
Custom Duty : the floods in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (the State) from whole of the duty as specified under the First Schedule and whole of...
Excise Duty : Grants exemption from Basic Excise Duty to goods donated or purchased out of cash donations for the relief and rehabilitation of p...
Custom Duty : New posts have been created in the rank of Commissioners of Customs in DRI and DGCEI for adjudication of cases as investigated by ...
The Court held that prolonged custody is unwarranted where evidence is largely documentary and risk of interference is minimal. Bail was granted as continued detention violated Article 21 rights.
Court held that GST remains payable if services were rendered, even without payment. It remanded matter for fresh consideration as taxpayer failed to provide adequate evidence.
Court ruled that a demand order without an officer’s signature remains valid when Form GST DRC-07 contains full officer details. It also held that rectification cannot be rejected without providing a personal hearing.
Court held that a consolidated SCN covering different financial years violates Section 73 and renders related demand orders void. Fresh notices may be issued within extended limitation.
The Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled merely for non-filing of returns if the taxpayer has fully paid the tax, interest, and late fees. Authorities must permit return filing and revoke cancellation upon compliance.
The Court held that authorities cannot take coercive steps against taxpayers in a fake ITC investigation if they participate fully in the inquiry. Cooperation ensures protection from arrest or similar actions.
The Court held that authorities must provide a personal hearing before issuing adverse GST orders under Section 73. Failure to follow Section 75(4) violates natural justice and renders the order unsustainable.
The Court will review whether ITC can be refused when the seller’s registration was valid on the transaction date but cancelled later. The case also highlights issues of natural justice and procedural fairness.
AAR rules that ITC is admissible on cables, switchyards, and related services used for electricity transmission to factory premises, even when installed outside.
AAR rules that blends of cotton seed oil cake and de-oiled cake retain original characteristics and must pay 5% GST, not exempt under cattle feed provisions.
