Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Debabrata Mallick Vs Deputy Director (Appellate Tribunal Under Safema At New Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Debabrata Mallick Vs Deputy Director (Appellate Tribunal Under Safema At New Delhi) Reverse Burden Applies: Tribunal Upholds Bank Freeze Where Source of Funds Not Proved under PMLA The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed the appeal challenging freezing of bank accounts and seizure of documents under Sections 17 and 17(1A) of the PMLA, holding that sufficient material existed to establish the appellant’s involvement in money laundering activities linked to diversion of bank loans by M/s BISWA and related entities. The Tribunal noted that the appellant, though claiming to be merely a Dir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930