Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT (BPU) Vs Jitendra Rameshbhai Patel & Ors. (Appellate Tribunal Under Safema At New Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT (BPU) Vs Jitendra Rameshbhai Patel & Ors. (Appellate Tribunal Under Safema At New Delhi) Demonetisation Cash Route Exposed – Fake Gold Sale Invoice Rejected- Tribunal Restores Benami Attachment on ₹9.5 Lakh Transfer The Initiating Officer filed appeal u/s 46 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (PBPT Act) challenging the order dated 16.03.2022 of the Adjudicating Authority, which had revoked Provisional Attachment Order No. 22.10.2021 concerning a ₹9.5 lakh cash transaction between Shri Jitendra Rameshbhai Patel (Benamidar) & M/s Om Gold Tradenet Ltd...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Bogus LTCG Addition Without Proof of Price Manipulation Linking Assessee: ITAT Raipur Bad Debt Write-off Enough After TRF Ltd.; Verify Only Section 36(2): ITAT Bangalore Ad Hoc Disallowance Without Defects Unsustainable; GST/TDS Late Fee Remanded: ITAT Lucknow Section 115BAB Benefit Can’t Be Denied Over Internal Appeal Allocation: ITAT Raipur CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031