Excise Duty Act, Rules Articles News Notification Circulars Instructions. Input Credit, Cenvat, Duty Rate, SSI Exemption, Excise on Jewellery,Excise on Garment
Excise Duty : India reduced excise duty on petrol and diesel to offset rising global crude prices due to geopolitical tensions. The move aimed t...
Excise Duty : Health Security & National Security (HSNS) Cess Act, 2025 introduces a standalone statutory cess aimed at funding national health ...
Excise Duty : The Court upheld the Tribunal’s view that interest cannot be levied when duty paid is fully creditable to downstream units. It c...
Excise Duty : The Court held that duty-paid items supplied directly to site are not includible when the final plant is immovable. The key takeaw...
Excise Duty : Discover how the Central Excise (Amendment) Act, 2025 revamps tobacco taxation, introducing steep excise duties on cigarettes, che...
Excise Duty : CBI Court in Siliguri sentences former Central Excise Superintendent to four years RI and Rs. 40,000 fine in a bribery case regist...
Excise Duty : A special court imposed five years’ rigorous imprisonment and heavy fines after finding assets far beyond known income. The ruli...
Excise Duty : The FAQs confirm that cess is computed on maximum rated machine speed rather than actual production. This ensures certainty in tax...
Excise Duty : The FAQs clarify how excise duty on chewing tobacco, jarda, and gutkha will be levied based on packing machine capacity rather tha...
Excise Duty : CESTAT issues instructions for e-filing appeals, detailing registration, filing process, documents, fees, and compliance with Proc...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Mumbai held that Rule 16(2) of the Central Excise Rules does not mandate that remanufactured goods be supplied back to the ...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that works contract services used for repair and maintenance of existing plant and machinery qualify as input se...
Excise Duty : CESTAT Chennai held that exports made under Notification No. 30/2004-CE and the DEPB scheme cannot be included in exempted turnove...
Excise Duty : The Tribunal held that the show cause notice issued more than three years after the Department became aware of the facts was time-...
Excise Duty : CESTAT held that where the value of goods sent for job work had already been considered for credit reversal purposes, including it...
Excise Duty : The Lakshadweep Excise Regulation, 2026 establishes a comprehensive framework for licensing, manufacture, sale, transport, and con...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 25/2026 revises SAED on ATF exports to Rs 9.5 per litre with effect from 1 June 2026; domestic petrol and diesel ...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 24/2026 revises SAED rates on petrol and diesel exports from 1 June 2026, setting duty at Rs 1.5 and Rs 13.5 per ...
Excise Duty : CBIC revised SAED on ATF exports to Rs. 16 per litre effective 16 May 2026, impacting aviation fuel exporters and export duty cost...
Excise Duty : The Ministry of Finance amended the central excise notification issued in March 2026 by revising rates applicable to specified goo...
Analysis of Raman Ispat Pvt Ltd Vs Cce Meerut case from Allahabad High Court. Once opted, excise duty payment method for a financial year cannot be changed midway.
Understand windfall tax, imposed on oil and gas companies due to unforeseen profit gains. Learn its implications and why India introduced it.
Ministry of Finance amends No. 18/2022-Central Excise to reduce Special Additional Excise Duty on Petroleum Crude production. Read Notification 15/2024 details here.
CESTAT Kolkata reduces penalty in Mittal Iron Foundry case, stating clandestine removal claims lack corroborative evidence.
In Kancor Ingredients Ltd vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad), the court rules that accumulated Cenvat Credit refund is valid for goods exported without a bond.
CESTAT Delhi rules on the National Engineering Industries Limited vs. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise case, focusing on service tax refunds and judicial discipline.
Calcutta High Court upholds the rejection of a retraction after 3 years and 9 months in the case of Anurag Steel Enterprise vs. Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise.
Case revolved around principle of restitution and whether petitioner was entitled to a refund of pre-deposit amount in light of overturning of original order.
CESTAT Bangalore ruling on AEG Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case underscores that misdeclaration invites extended limitation.
Kerala High Court directs the Excise Commissioner to consider a representation against the proposed liquor outlet near a forest area alongside the application of Kerala State Beverages Corporation.
