Assessee has every right to know reasons for passing a demand order against him, said High Court of Tripura by setting aside impugned non-speaking demand order.
Shri Keshab Purkayastha Vs Union of India (Tripura High Court) The impugned order dated 16.11.2022 passed by the respondent No.3, apart from being illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction, is apparently perverse and fraught with patent illegality since it was conclusively decided by the respondent No.2 after consulting the relevant laws that the services rendered by […]
Maharaja Gas Agency Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) Facts- The petitioner is carrying the business of distribution of Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) as well as transportation of LPG and LPG cylinders. On participation in a tender, invited by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL), he was successful in the bid for grant of […]
Satguru Impex Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) The petitioner made mistakes in the e-way bill in the names of buyers and sellers. In place of buyer’s name, seller name was filled and in place of seller’s name, buyer name was filled. The mistake was rectified by generating fresh e-way bill. The GST departments […]
Progressive Enterprise Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) The goods were sent form Guwahati to Tripura. Due to some reasons goods were not unloaded and the petitioner sought to take back the goods to Guwahati. The Driver stated to the concern inspector that he is waiting for the fresh tax invoices and e-way bills […]
Rimi Sales Agency Vs Union of India (Tripura High Court) Show-cause notice was issued on 06.11.2018 which required the petitioner to appear before the said authority on 23.11.2018. Without permitting the petitioner to appear and file reply and oppose the demands the Inspector confirmed the demand by passing separate orders on 06.11.2018. This was wholly […]
Tirthamoyee Aluminium Products Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) Due to a clerical error in the e-way Bill the distance from the place of origin to the destination was shown as 470 Kms. instead of actual distance of 1470 Kms. There is no dispute that the goods were sold by way of inter-state sale […]
HC held that GST Assessment order passed without issuing SCN for the period of Assessment is invalid & criticized Assessing Officer for half-baked, incomplete and internet acquired knowledge and for not following principle of natural justice.
Superintendent of Taxes attached to the Audit cell cannot be delegated the power of assessment by the Commissioner of Taxes.
Podder & Podder Industries Private Limited Vs State of Tripura and others (Tripura High Court) HC held that balance has to be brought between transportation of goods as well as the taxing event i.e. the sale or purchase of goods of service. In a case where there is no doubt that a transaction is made […]
