Explore the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgment on New Morning Star Travels vs. Deputy Commissioner (ST). Analysis of GST assessment order implications.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that the complainant miserably failed to prove the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 against the respondent/accused beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, Criminal Appeal dismissed.
Explore Andhra Pradesh High Court’s analysis of sufficient cause for delay in filing a GST appeal and the interpretation of Section 107(4) of CGST Act.
In a legal battle, Arhaan Ferrous and Non-Ferrous Solutions face GST issues. Learn about the responsibility of purchasers in verifying seller’s GST registration.
High Court of Andhra Pradesh confirms the constitutional validity of Section 16(4) of the APGST and CGST Act, 2017, regarding Input Tax Credit. Learn about the court’s rulings on key questions.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that suspension of Customs Broker Licence is against the principles of natural justice as Managing Director being in the judicial custody couldn’t have any opportunity to submit his explanation.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that initiation of demand of tax u/s 74 may be either section 61 (scrutiny of returns) or section 65 (audit by tax authorities) or some other fact. Mere scrutiny of return not mandatory for initiation of demand of tax u/s 74.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held that order for continuing the suspension of Customs Broker Licence without affording adequate opportunity of being heard is against the principles of natural justice. Writ disposed off with direction to submit written explanation within specified time.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held that life tax is to be collected from the vehicle owner upon sale based on the net invoice price of the vehicle and not the ex-showroom price of the vehicle. The life tax can be levied only on the cost of the vehicle under the 6th schedule of the A.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act
Read about the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s decision to allow a writ petition challenging a penalty order that violated the principles of natural justice. Get a comprehensive analysis of the case and its implications.
