It is settled law that appellant refund claim wherein order determining duty is not challenged and modified in appeal by appellate authority, refund claim is not maintainable.
Rajdev Inter Trade Pvt. Ltd. vs. C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad) analysis: Remelted zinc deemed as zinc alloy, attracting 7.5% customs duty. Detailed order review.
CESTAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ganesh Benzoplast Ltd., stating no confiscation if prior permission taken for storage of non-bonded goods in bonded warehouse. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
Philips India Limited vs Commissioner of Customs (Air Cargo) case analyzed by CESTAT Chennai. Detailed order reveals why differential duty demand was unsustainable.
Explore the implications of the recent CESTAT Delhi ruling in South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Excise case, shedding light on Service Tax refund issues and judicial discipline.
Explore the CESTAT Delhi order in the case of Shrawan Kumar Pathak vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Central GST, concerning service tax on royalties paid to the State Government. Get insights into the legal nuances and judicial precedents.
Dive into the CESTAT Kolkata ruling on CENVAT credit dispute between Commissioner of Central Excise and Viraj Steel regarding steel items usage.
The CESTAT Mumbai allows the appeal in the case of Reliable Automotive Private Limited versus Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, setting aside demands and penalties. Get insights into the legal proceedings and conclusions.
The appellant, in a recent case involving the supply of crude oil/gas to ONGC, failed to meet the stipulated event for service completion. Consequently, the obligation to pay service tax was deemed non-applicable.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on liability for duty on fire bricks dismantled from kilns. Analysis, precedent, and conclusion provided in this detailed article.
