Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : The article explains how Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals apply to related party transactions under corporate law...
Company Law : The article explains that companies need a balanced mix of Executive, Non-Executive, and Independent Directors for effective gover...
Company Law : This article explains which companies must appoint Key Managerial Personnel under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013. It highl...
Company Law : Private limited companies with turnover above ₹200 crore or borrowings exceeding ₹100 crore must appoint an internal auditor u...
Company Law : The article highlights how companies completed PAS-3 filings but failed to maintain critical Right Issue documentation such as off...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : The issue concerns eligibility and participation rules for the convocation. ICSI has clarified that members who do not attend will...
Company Law : NFRA introduced guidelines to evaluate audit firms’ compliance and quality control systems. The framework emphasizes governance,...
Company Law : ICSI has proposed revising the CS syllabus to align with the National Education Policy and global practices. Stakeholder input wil...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Company Law : The Madras High Court permitted Nidhi companies to submit fresh replies against NDH-4 rejection orders and directed authorities to...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai held that existence of an arbitration clause in the MoU did not bar initiation of CIRP under Section 7 of the IBC. The...
Company Law : NCLT held that inclusion of a prospective bidder in an email chain was an isolated inadvertent act caused by auto-suggest and not ...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
The NCLAT Delhi held that adverse observations made against an IRP in NCLT proceedings should not affect his reputation when no opportunity to respond was given.
NCLT Delhi held that insolvency of real-estate project is to be held project-specific. Accordingly, order set aside and matter revived before Adjudicating Authority to consider section 7 petition afresh.
ROC Pune imposed penalties under Section 203(5) of the Companies Act for not appointing a whole-time Company Secretary within six months after exceeding ₹10 crore paid-up capital.
Non-filing of FY 2020-21 Annual Return led to Rs. 1.48 lakh company and Rs. 50k officer penalty, highlighting strict compliance enforcement under Section 92(5).
ROC Mumbai imposed penalties for non-compliance with Section 12(1) of the Companies Act as the company failed to maintain its registered office despite change filings.
NCLT Mumbai found Section 10 petition complete, with no pending disciplinary issues against proposed IRP, and ordered commencement of CIRP for Comp-Print Kalpana Private Limited.
The ROC Kanpur imposed penalties for not maintaining consecutively numbered minutes, holding it as a breach of Section 118(11) and Secretarial Standards.
The ROC Mumbai levied ₹1 lakh each on a company and its directors for failing to maintain a registered office in violation of Section 12(1) of the Companies Act.
The Registrar ruled that income classified as “Other Income” under accounting standards does not amount to deviation from main business objects under the Companies Act.
The ROC Mumbai found no contravention under Section 4(1)(c) of the Companies Act after verifying that the company operated within its amended MoA, leading to no penalty.
