Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Private limited companies with turnover above ₹200 crore or borrowings exceeding ₹100 crore must appoint an internal auditor u...
Company Law : The article highlights how companies completed PAS-3 filings but failed to maintain critical Right Issue documentation such as off...
Company Law : The Companies Act, 2013 and related rules now require most public and private companies to issue and transfer securities only in d...
Company Law : The Companies Law Amendment Bill, 2026 proposes major reforms in corporate governance, compliance, and digital regulation. This ar...
Company Law : This guide explains the complete legal procedure for shifting a company’s registered office within the same state but under a di...
Company Law : Provisional list of audit firms of listed companies yet to file NFRA-2 for 2023-24. Filing deadline was 30.11.2025; fines apply fo...
Company Law : ICSI recommended restoring public access to basic company master data without mandatory login requirements. The representation sta...
Company Law : The issue concerns eligibility and participation rules for the convocation. ICSI has clarified that members who do not attend will...
Company Law : NFRA introduced guidelines to evaluate audit firms’ compliance and quality control systems. The framework emphasizes governance,...
Company Law : ICSI has proposed revising the CS syllabus to align with the National Education Policy and global practices. Stakeholder input wil...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Company Law : The Madras High Court permitted Nidhi companies to submit fresh replies against NDH-4 rejection orders and directed authorities to...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai held that existence of an arbitration clause in the MoU did not bar initiation of CIRP under Section 7 of the IBC. The...
Company Law : NCLT held that inclusion of a prospective bidder in an email chain was an isolated inadvertent act caused by auto-suggest and not ...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that procedural lapses in a private placement involving one investor formed part of a single integrated transaction ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a start-up company and its officers for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-14 relating to a Special Resolution under ...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for delayed filing of e-Form PAS-3 relating to private placement allotment under Se...
Company Law : ROC Pune penalized a company and its directors for utilizing private placement funds before filing return of allotment under Secti...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order h...
ROC Delhi imposes penalty on GAME CHANGERS TEXFAB LIMITED and its directors for violating Sections 62 and 117(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, related to loan conversion and special resolution filing.
ROC Delhi imposes a ₹45,00,000 penalty on Game Changers Texfab Limited and two directors for multiple failures related to Private Placement rules under Section 42(10).
ROC Delhi fined Game Changers Texfab Limited and its directors ₹1,16,000 for a 56-day delay in filing the Return of Allotment (PAS-3). Subsidiary status denied reduced penalty.
ROC Ahmedabad issues an adjudication order and ₹1,26,000 penalty on Narayan Organics Pvt Ltd and its directors for a 215-day delay in filing a Board Resolution (MGT-14) under the Companies Act, 2013.
The Companies Amendment Rules, 2025, expand fast-track merger eligibility under Section 233 to unlisted companies (with a ₹200 cr debt cap) and certain holding-subsidiary mergers.
Gujarat Kidney and Super Speciality Limited penalized ₹12,80,000 by ROC Ahmedabad for a 256-day delay in filing the revised Return of Allotment (PAS-3) and related stamp duty issues.
NCLAT Delhi held that claim of wages and salaries after the issuance of the layoff notice rightly rejected since the appellant workmen due to issuance of the layoff notice has not worked after issuance of this layoff notice. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
NCLAT Delhi Held that a written agreement is not a condition precedent to prove the existence of a financial debt. Accordingly, CIRP application u/s. 7 of IBC duly admitted as debt and default proved.
NCLAT Delhi held that suspended directors, who invested about 5.5 crores and having 51% equity in Corporate Debtor, cannot claim that they were not aware about initiation of CIRP. Accordingly, observation of Adjudicating Authority that Suspended Board of Directors of the Corporate Debtor were not cooperating with the IRP/RP/Liquidator was justifiable.
ROC Ahmedabad adjudicated penalties on a company and its directors for minor record date and allotment errors in a rights issue. The ruling highlights that voluntary correction and good corporate governance can mitigate penalties.
